BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Ashoka University - ECPv6.18.2//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://www.ashoka.edu.in
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Ashoka University
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Asia/Kolkata
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0530
TZOFFSETTO:+0530
TZNAME:IST
DTSTART:20210101T000000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Kolkata:20220901T110000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Kolkata:20220901T120000
DTSTAMP:20220814T013655Z
CREATED:20220814T013655Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220814T013655Z
UID:33489-1662030000-1662033600@www.ashoka.edu.in
SUMMARY:Functional implication of a protein complex consisting of enzymes with opposing activities
DESCRIPTION:Abstract :  \nThere are about 2-4 million proteins in 1 femtolitre of cytoplasm. These proteins constitute the crucial infrastructure of the cell\, performing diverse functions like catalysis (by enzymes)\, transport (by motor proteins)\, and signaling. How do these proteins perform these tasks in a streamlined manner in such a crowded environment? The answer to this is regulation. Regulation of activity of these proteins\, based on internal or external signals\, is crucial for cellular homeostasis. However\, there are multiple ways of regulating a protein. For instance\, the activity of an enzyme\, once expressed in the cell\, can be regulated by covalent modification\, allosteric regulation or by regulating the half-life of the enzyme. Why one regulatory mode is chosen over the other during evolution is not entirely clear. Knowing the logic of each regulatory mode is crucial to understand how life works. In my talk\, I will present a paradoxical mode of enzyme activity regulation that we discovered in B. subtilis. The enzyme of interest GudB\, that breaks glutamate\, is regulated by binding to another enzyme\, GltAB that catalyzes the opposite reaction. I will present kinetic and structural evidence that in the enzyme complex\, GudB is inhibited by GltAB binding. Why to regulate an enzyme in such a complex way? It turns out that this complex mode of regulation is an elegant solution for the metabolic requirements of the interior and the peripheral cells of the Bacillus biofilm. Such a regulatory design offers robustness to change in environmental conditions.I will also briefly present other examples of such designs in biology (made of opposing activities) and discuss their utility in synthetic biology. Finally\, I will conclude with an evolutionary perspective of the emergence of this complex in the Bacillus species tree and describe our efforts to evolve such an anti-metabolon using directed evolution. \nShort Bio:  \nVijay Jayaraman is a post-doctoral fellow in the laboratory of Prof. Uri Alon at the Weizmann Institute of Science\, Israel. Vijay did his B. Pharma from Madras Medical College\, Chennai and then M.Tech (Biotechnology) from West Bengal University of Technology\, Kolkata\, where he was supported by a fellowship from DBT. He joined JNCASR for his Ph.D. in the lab of Prof. Hemalatha Balaram where he worked on structure-function aspects of the Plasmodium enzyme\, fumarate hydratase. Following this\, he joined Weizmann Institute of Science for his post-doctoral work in the lab of the late Prof. Dan Tawfik where he worked for 3 years before moving to Prof. Uri Alon’s lab. His Ph.D. was supported by CSIR-UGC and his post-doctoral work was funded by the Israel science foundation and the Feinberg graduate school. \n 
URL:https://www.ashoka.edu.in/event/functional-implication-of-a-protein-complex-consisting-of-enzymes-with-opposing-activities/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Kolkata:20220901T160000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Kolkata:20220901T170000
DTSTAMP:20220827T011226Z
CREATED:20220827T011226Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220827T011226Z
UID:33945-1662048000-1662051600@www.ashoka.edu.in
SUMMARY:Fishing for developmental mechanisms driving stress-responsive behaviour and epilepsy
DESCRIPTION:Abstract:  \nIn vertebrates\, the nervous system is among the first organ systems to develop\, but the process of neuronal differentiation is long-drawn and regulated by numerous factors. In my talk\, I will discuss how major defects in this process lead to neurological diseases\, while subtle differences in development result in the establishment of individual behaviours.   \nI will first detail how we used a combination of behavioural and molecular biology tools to understand the mechanisms underlying epilepsy\, a common neurodevelopmental disorder. Specifically\, we found a new role for an mTOR inhibitory factor\, depdc5\, in the formation of inhibitory neurons. Defective mTOR regulation and GABAergic neuron maturation independently lead to epilepsy when DEPDC5 is mutated.   \nIn the second half of my talk\, I will discuss my work on the ontogeny of stress resilience. Individuals in a population respond differently to stressful situations\, with some being more resilient than others. However\, it remains challenging to determine the developmental window when resilience is established as a trait using mammalian embryos. Using a high-throughput behavioural assay that I recently developed\, we established that stress resilience is observed early in life as a stable and heritable trait. Using a combination of pharmacological and genetic tools\, we found that this trait is regulated positively by neuropeptides and negatively by the innate immune complement system.   \n  \nAbout Speaker:  \nAmrutha Swaminathan is currently a postdoctoral fellow with Prof Gil Levkowitz at the Weizmann Institute of Science\, Israel. She works on the developmental origins of stress resilience using zebra fish as a model. She tries to understand the developmental basis for neurological disorders such as epilepsy\, and also how small developmental differences can determine individual behaviour. \n  \n 
URL:https://www.ashoka.edu.in/event/fishing-for-developmental-mechanisms-driving-stressresponsive-behaviour-and-epilepsy/
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR